Spring                   Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- Department of Sport Sciences, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
2- Department of Sports, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal. Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal. Department of Sports and Physical Education, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
3- Department of Sport Sciences, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal , desteves@ubi.pt
Abstract:   (321 Views)
Background. The central issue of research ethics is how the potential conflict between scientific goals and the people’s interests taking part in the research should be overcome. People must have absolute priority and protection to prevent harm to research participants.
Objectives. When conducting sports tests at maximum rates, assess all possible risks for research participants. Consider ethical methods of control when conducting various trials related to human life.
Methods. Diverse literature touches on the moments and aspects of an ethical approach to the problem of conducting maximum tests.
Results. There is a standard model of procedures in maximal tests performed with athletes. The research and testing model is based on ethical principles disclosed in the Helsinki declaration.
Conclusion. Since there are always no rules of behavior applicable to all situations, ethics provides operating principles, norms, and values for action that man will apply evolutionarily, using his reason.
Full-Text [PDF 232 kb]   (62 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review Article | Subject: Respiratory
Received: 2022/03/12 | Accepted: 2022/04/27

References
1. Boxill J. Sports ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006.
2. Foster C, Porcari JP. The risks of exercise training. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. 2001;21(6):347-52. [DOI:10.1097/00008483-200111000-00002] [PMID]
3. Euroscientist A. The Brussels declaration on ethics & principles for science & society policy-making [Internet]. Euroscientist.com. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.euroscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Brussels-Declaration.pdf
4. Statement by the ALLEA permanent working group on science and ethics, [Internet]. Allea.org. 2013 [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Statement_Ethics_Edu_web_final_2013_10_10.pdf
5. Miller J, Evans T. Some reflections on ethical dilemmas in nursing home research. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1991;13(3):375-81. [DOI:10.1177/019394599101300307] [PMID]
6. Hegedus E, McDonough S, Bleakley C, Cook C, Baxter G. Clinician-friendly lower extremity physical performance measures in athletes: a systematic review of measurement properties and correlation with injury, part 1. The tests for knee function including the hop tests. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;49(10):642-648. [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094094] [PMID]
7. Foster C. Is There Risk in Exercise Testing of Athletes?. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2017;12(7):849-850. [DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0290] [PMID]
8. Deslandes A, Moraes H, Ferreira C, Veiga H, Silveira H, Mouta R, et al. Exercise and mental health: Many reasons to move. Neuropsychobiology. 2009;59(4):191-8. [DOI:10.1159/000223730] [PMID]
9. Van Ness PH, Towle VR, O'Leary JR, Fried TR. Religion, risk, and medical decision making at the end of life. Journal of Aging and Health. 2008;20(5):545-59. [DOI:10.1177/0898264308317538] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. King NMP, Perrin J. Ethical issues in stem cell research and therapy. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2014;5(4). [DOI:10.1186/scrt474] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Foster C, Porcari JP. The risks of exercise training. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. 2001;21(6):347-52. [DOI:10.1097/00008483-200111000-00002] [PMID]
12. McNamee M, Olivier S, Wainwright P. Research ethics in exercise, health and sports sciences. London: Routledge; 2007. [DOI:10.4324/9780203966853]
13. Peh WC, Ng KH. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct. Singapore Med J. 2010;51(12):908-12.
14. Tijdink J, Verbeke R, Smulders Y. Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2014;9(5):64-71. [DOI:10.1177/1556264614552421] [PMID]
15. UK Academy of Medical Sciences (2015). Perspective on "Conflict of Interest". Acmedsci.ac.uk. [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/41514-572ca1ddd6cca.pdf
16. Petronio S, Dicorcia MJ, Duggan A. Navigating ethics of physician-patient confidentiality: a communication privacy management analysis. Perm J [Internet]. 2012 Autumn;16(4):41-5. [DOI:10.7812/TPP/12-042] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Budimir V, Cerjan-Letica G, Budimir J, Macan D. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Awareness of Croatian Dentists Concerning Patients' Confidentiality and Privacy. Journal of Dental Education. 2013;77(3):370-376. [DOI:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.3.tb05481.x] [PMID]
18. Malin B, Emam K, O'Keefe C. Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013;20(1):2-6. [DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001509] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Liguory G, Feito Y, Fountaine C, Roy B. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
20. Herdy AH, Ritt LE, Stein R, Araújo CG, Milani M, Meneghelo RS, Ferraz AS, Hossri CA, Almeida AE, Fernandes-Silva MM, Serra SM. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test: Fundamentals, Applicability and Interpretation. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 11]. [DOI:10.5935/abc.20160171]
21. Skalski J, Allison TG, Miller TD. The safety of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in a population with high-risk cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2012;126:2465-2472. [DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.110460] [PMID]
22. Angell PJ, Chester N, Sculthorpe N, Whyte G, George K, Somauroo J. Performance enhancing drug abuse and cardiovascular risk in athletes: implications for the clinician. British Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2012 Oct 24 [cited 2022 Apr 11];46(Suppl 1):i78-i84. [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091186] [PMID]
23. Mussa F.A.A. Anti-doping control and public health: limits to the exposure of human health to risk in the name of sporting glory (2013).
24. Franklin BA, Billecke S. Putting the benefits and risks of aerobic exercise in perspective. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11:201-208. [DOI:10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825dabd4] [PMID]
25. Pigozzi F. Role of exercise stress test in master athletes. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(8):527-531. [DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2004.014340] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Orchard JJ, Neubeck L, Orchard JW, Puranik R, Raju H, Freedman B, et al. ECG-based cardiac screening programs: Legal, ethical, and logistical considerations. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(10):1584-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.025] [PMID]
27. Harriss D, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for Ethics in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2018 Update. 2018. [DOI:10.1055/s-0043-124001] [PMID]
28. Pigozzi F. Role of exercise stress test in master athletes. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(8):527-531. [DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2004.014340] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Eijsvogels TM, Thompson PD. Are there clinical cardiac complications to too much exercise? Curr Sports Med Rep. 2017;16:9-11. [DOI:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000322] [PMID]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 All Rights Reserved | Annals of Applied Physiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb